"Recent accusations against him notwithstanding, the power of the overall reading experience is such that the book remains a deeply inspiring and redemptive story for millions of readers."Wrong. So wrong. The power of Frey's book stemmed entirely from its supposed truth. Without truth, it's a story about a fictional thug who goes into rehab and rejects 12-step therapy. That might be an interesting story, but not an inspiring or redemptive one -- and, I suspect, not one that would sell 3.5 million copies.
Here's the difference between book publishers and publishers of journalism. Had Frey worked for a newspaper, something like this would have happened in the wake of The Smoking Gun article:
- Frey would have been put on paid leave.
- The paper would launch its own investigation of his work.
- Frey would be required to co-operate, and if he didn't, he'd be fired.
- There'd be some kind of editor's note published, acknowledging the accusations against Frey and announcing the paper's investigation.
- The paper, no doubt, would quickly find that The Smoking Gun's report is accurate.
- The paper would publish a lengthy correction of the story, or perhaps, given the extent of the fabrications, just retract the thing altogether. Frey would be fired.
- The paper would publish a lengthy story detailing its investigation of its own writer and analyzing what went wrong. Editors might resign or be fired.
- The larger journalism community would be a-twitter, with independent analysis, investigation and criticism.
In other words: "We got your money already, so screw you."
Update (a couple days late): Lying is okay with Oprah.
Double update: Scary. Michelle Malkin and I agree on something.
Triple-dog update: Seth Mnookin, who says he was a legit junkie, tears apart Frey and his crappy book. I'm starting to wonder why I liked it in the first place. The excerpts Mnookin cites are pretty terrible writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment